Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Film: "Bright Star" (2009)

Rarely have I been so annoyed at fellow film-goers as I was at the end of Jane Campion's Bright Star (the photographs in this post are taken mainly from the official website), when the end credits started to roll and Ben Whishaw's voice began reading Ode to a Nightingale, while they - rude and ignorant movie audience that deserve to watch Avatar forever and ever - giggled and talked loudly not even bothering to leave the theatre.

The film was obviously still going on, Whishaw was doing perhaps his finest piece of screen acting to date and the fact that it was a voice over did not mean it was less important. I, for one, would have loved to hear all of his cristalline rendition of Keats' poem.
Bright Star 4

But if you happen to watch it with a better-mannered audience, nothing can mar the beauty of this film. Beauty is not an adjective used lightly or for lack of a wider vocabulary with reference to Bright Star: each sequence, each scene, each frame of this ode to love is a perfect composition of light, colour and sound that I can recall only seeing in Visconti or in Kubrick's Barry Lyndon.

Bright Star 1

Perhaps this beauty - of summer and autumn in the Kentish landscape, of the naturally lit interiors (by a fireplace, candles, or the natural daylight pouring through an open kitchen's door) - is at times too much, too artistically distracting from the main narrative.

And yet, it works, because this is a film about the fleeting happiness and quiet torment of young love, its heightened emotions and the world perceived through the eyes of different kinds of artists (one of them a genius) for whom love is both very real and transcendent: a key to the beauty of the universe around them.

Fanny Brawne, the object of Keats' love (and of his adoring critics' vilification for many years to come), is also an artist. Campion dedicates many scenes to her embroidery and stitching, showing the equivalence between John and his friends' work and her own. She proudly claims that her sewing is of equal value to their writing and that, unlike what they do, "it makes money," too. It certainly creates beauty and illustrates her sentiments to those she loves and who love her.

She wears her fashionable, self-designed laces and trims without shame, shrugging off accusations of being "flirty," and when the time of mourning comes she replaces the bright colour palette of pinks and whites and purples, with a black one that expresses her grief: all her own creation.

The story is a simple and well-known one, banal even, if it wasn't for Keats' poems and letters that have immortalised it: two young people fall in love and feel and hope and are a little tormented in the way that all young lovers are.

Keats' poverty and then his illness, all the obstacles that are thrown in Fanny and John's way are incidental, because Campion's focus is mainly on the nature of love, attempting as she does to grasp the origin and growth of this most exquisite of feelings: why it makes us climb up trees, fill our room with butterflies, write verses or do cross-stitching, adore our little sister just a little bit more.

Bright Star 2

Or how it makes us want to stop breathing once and for all when it leaves us.

The acting of the entire cast is wonderful, but of course the film belongs to Ben Whishaw, who is simply perfect as the young, fragile Keats (I utterly disliked his performance as Sebastian Flyte in Andrew Davies' Brideshead Revisited: I thought it was misguided - clearly by the director - and manneristic; I am glad that his considerable talent has found a perfect match in Campion). And it belongs even more to Abbie Cornish, who portrays Fanny as a self-possessed young woman, aware of her desires and of her worth, undaunted by how others try to define her.
Bright Star 3

I was glad to find out that while Fanny cherished the memory of her love for Keats forever (wearing his lock of hair close to her heart for the rest of her life), she also lived and loved again.

Monday, March 8, 2010

NZ International Arts Festival 2010 - Revolt of the Mannequins (Day 3)

Nothing new to report from Day 3 (of 9) of the Revolt of the Mannequins, by Royal de Luxe, part of the 2010 NZ international Festival of the Arts (See Day 1 here andDay 2 here).

However, today I've noticed several other evil gnomes (K. calls them "munchkins") at the Evil Tale for Other People's Children performance, right inside the Pearl shop. They look ominous.

Evile Tale (3)

Evil Tale (3)_detail

Evil Tale (3)_upside down gnome

Sunday, March 7, 2010

NZ International Arts Festival 2010 - Revolt of the Mannequins (Day 2)

Second Day of street theatre in Wellington, part of the 2010 NZ international Festival of the Arts

Revolt of the Mannequins, by Royal de Luxe - Day 2 (of 9). See Day 1 here.

Closing-Down Sale
Sale (2)_1

Sale (2)_2

Mystery performance across the road from Closing-Down Sale (unlisted in the programme)
Mystery (2)_window

Mystery (2)

Evil Tale for Other People's Children
Evil Tale (2)

Evil Tale (2)_close up 1

Evil Tale (2)_close up 2

The Comic Fire Brigade
Fire Brigade (2)

Fire Brigade (2)_dtail

Fire Brigade (2)_side view

The Angelus, By Millet (I love how this developed overnight!)
Angelus (2)

Angelus (2)_detail

Eat Your Soup If You Want To Grow Up Big And Strong
Eat Your Soup (2)

Nightmare of the Puddle
Puddle (2)

Puddle (2)_detail

The Hunter (this hunter is a bit of a twit, methinks)
Hunter (2)

Hunter (2)_hound

Positive Test (I wasn't expecting this!)
Postitive Test (2)

Positive Test (2)_detail

The Kitchen
Kitchen (2)

The Lovers
Lovers (2)_him

Lovers (2)_her

Lovers (2)_Beating Heart

Lovers (2)

Saturday, March 6, 2010

NZ International Arts Festival 2010 - Revolt of the Mannequins (Day 1)

Street theatre in Wellington, part of the 2010 NZ international Festival of the Arts

Revolt of the Mannequins, by Royal de Luxe - Day 1 (of 9)

Closing-Down Sale
Closing-Down Sale 1

Closing-Down Sale 2

Evil Tale for Other People's Children
Evil Tale 1

Evil Tale 2

The Comic Fire Brigade
Fire Brigade 1

Fire Brigade 2

Fire Brigade 3

The Angelus, by Millet
Angelus 1

Angelus 2

Eat Your Soup If You Want to Grow Up Big And Strong
Eat Your Soup

Nightmare of the Puddle
Nightmare of the Puddle

The Hunter
The Hunter

The Hunter_hound

Positive Test
Positive test

The Kitchen
The Kitchen

The Lovers
The Lovers_him

The Lovers_her

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Theatre: The Bridge Project

The past two Saturdays, I went to Auckland to see The Cherry Orchard and The Winter's Tale staged by the Bridge Project. It's a collaboration between the Brooklyn Academy of Music in NYC and the Old Vic in London. Both plays are directed by Sam Mendes and performed by a cast that includes Simon Russell Beale, Sinaed Cusack, Rebecca Hall, Ethan Hawke, Richard Easton, Josh Hamilton and other extremely talented British and American actors.

Here in New Zealand (which they visited on their way to Singapore, Germany, Spain and England) they had to negotiate the difficult space (sound-wise) of the Aotea Centre, which some (the Britsh members of the cast, to be perfectly honest) did more successfully than others. I would have preferred to see both plays ina a smaller, more contained theatre, such as the Old Vic.

I had a few doubts about their take on The Cherry Orchard. Of course, the cast was excellent, especially Simon Russell Beale who interpreted Lopakhin with cringe-inducing social awkwardness, but also with a subtly repressed desire for acceptance and revenge, one that made his big scene in Act 2 - where he reveals he has bought the orchard - one of the most heart-stopping moments of theatre I've ever seen.

His elation for finally owning the property his slave father and grandfather were never allowed to step in is gorgeous: he tilts one by one all the chairs in the room, rages at Ranevskaya for not having listened to him, to his advice to save the property, but at the same time can't hide his internal gloating. If he cannot be accepted by the aristocrats he admires and lends money to, if he cannot be loved by Ranevskaya, he will, at the very least, enjoy the wealth they've wasted and become even richer out of their foolishness.

The Cherry Orchard

But there is something about Sam Mendes' staging, such a perfect stylisation of movement and characterisation, in his use of the set, of the lights that cast long shadows (making people look like trees, a human orchard that is about to be "cut" by the passing of time and history), the intervention of chilling, ominous music, that failed to touch me on an emotional level.

I've seen much less sophisticated versions of Chekhov's final play, less visionary productions, less polished and professional, perhaps, but that have touched me more deeply. This one, however, resonates as a warning for the present and we, the audience, are encouraged to identify with Ranevskaya and her silly brother Gaev, the ruling class aware of their inevitable demise, yet unable and most of all unwilling to adapt to the changing times, the rise of the new classes and the needs of an even poorer, more enraged class on their heels: bewildered and too enamoured with the memory of past summers in our orchard to accept that it doesn't belong to us anymore, that it never did.

With The Winter's Tale, instead, Mendes and the company achieve exactly the opposite result. Shakespeare's final play is a difficult one for a contemporary audience who likes unified style, clear-cut protagonists, over-arching themes, unity of time and perhaps defined morality. It is, in other word, a play that defies all kinds of emotional identification and easy moralism.

Mendes embraces all these challanges and the cast rises to the challenge with him, collectively. I honestly have never seen such a large cast work so beautifully together in even the "smallest" of roles. The first half is tragedy, dominated by an extraordinary Simon Russell Beale's King Leontes of Sicilia who, in his paranoid jelousy, causes the end of his friendship with King Polyxenes of Bohemia, the death of his own son Mamillius, that of his wife Hermiones and the abandonment/loss of their daughter Perdita.

Paulina, whose husband Antigonus also dies as a consequence of Leontes' madness, is the only one who truly stands up to him, who calls him tyrant and who eventually forces him to face his guilt through 16 years of penance and grief, both a support and a reminder of his folly. Sinead Cusack is wonderful in this role, much more convincing than her constantly bewildered Ranevskaya, in my opnion.

If the first half is darkness and tragedy, a perennial winter lit only by candles that are blown off one by one after Hermione's death, the second half, 16 years later, is youth, light, music in another land that looks very much like the American Western prairie: it's romance and comedy. It's spring.

As I said, all the cast is amazing, with Richard Easton as Time and the shepard who adopts Perdita, and Tobias Segal as his son, providing a truly funny counterpart to the tragic interactions of the first half. But to be honest, Ethan Hawke as the thief Autolycus steals the show. I was surprised, because I found his Trofimov in The Cherry Orchard adequate but underwhelming, in fact a little too neurotic; too - how can I say it - American for Chekhov's play.

The Winter's Tale

But as Autolycus he shines: he has the opportunity to sing, move with the physicality of a confident rogue, sexy and cynical, funny and annoying, yet fundamentally "good", whether he likes it or not, even without final redemption.

Redemption comes for Leontes in the final act, the one that brings the American Arcadia in contact with the Old-World tragedy: below the surface, the two worlds are not too dissimilar, because also Polyxenes proves to be a tyrant, one who won't allow his son Florizel to marry beneath his social class. Of course, we know that Florizel is in fact in love with Perdita and that through appropriate revelations the order of things will be restored, but Leontes decides to plead the cause of Florizel and Perdita before he knows she is his long-lost daughter, having learnt through grief the lesson that Paulina was trying to teach him: don't be a tyrant, listen to the truth, be tolerant. Forgive.

Only once the two tyrants have learnt their lesson the final miracle can unravel and the statue of dead Hermione comes to life. Is it Paulina's magic that brings the queen back to life, or is it finally Hermione (whose death we only heard through Paulina's own words) who has decided that her husband has now grieved enough? I like to think the latter, of course, and imagine 16 years of Hermione and Paulina living secretly together, loving each other while measuring the penance for Leontes, until they decide he can be forgiven when Perdita reappears: the power of maternal love.

But it doesn't matter, really. What matters is that time has healed old wounds, winter is over, what was lost has finally been found (Mamillius and Perdita are interpreted by the same actress, in a clever twist on the tradition that sees Hermione and Perdita often played by the same person) and tyrants have become good fathers, husbands, kings.